From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Darrington Subject: Re: Gegl build failures Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 19:14:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20141122181417.GA19687@jocasta.intra> References: <20141120181246.GA15990@debian.math.u-bordeaux1.fr> <87d28fcdrc.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39235) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsFCm-0005nZ-Q1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 13:14:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsFCi-0000xR-Jb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 13:14:44 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d28fcdrc.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic Court??s Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, John Darrington --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 07:05:11PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote: Andreas Enge skribis: =20 > gegl, an input for gimp, fails its tests: > http://hydra.gnu.org/build/159641/nixlog/1/tail-reload > > We already have the following comments in the package: > ;; This test program seems to crash on exit. Specifically,= whilst > ;; g_object_unreffing bufferA and bufferB - This seems to = be a bug > ;; in the destructor. This is just a test program so will= not have > ;; any wider effect, although might be hiding another prob= lem. > ;; According to advice received on irc.gimp.org#gegl altho= ugh 0.2.0 > ;; is the latest released version, any bug reports against= it will > ;; be ignored. So we are on our own. > before a line that removes one test. I would suggest to disable all = tests. =20 That sounds reasonable, but since John did the initial investigation a= nd discussed with GEGL people, I???d like to know what he thinks. =20 Yeah, I can't think of a better idea at the moment. J' --=20 PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3=20 fingerprint =3D 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key. --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlRw0nkACgkQimdxnC3oJ7Og8gCghhzi41nYJL0Kxd9FGJOyhJnZ qssAoIZps/zmPtmvIWDBbnQP8LgXx62D =JDtM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--