From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Darrington Subject: Re: wip-libreoffice Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 18:22:23 +0100 Message-ID: <20141121172222.GA3900@intra> References: <20141113180141.GA1223@jocasta.intra> <20141114184431.GA4323@debian> <20141114191738.GA14298@jocasta.intra> <20141118224427.GA26820@debian> <20141119061650.GA4201@jocasta.intra> <20141120225608.GA14628@debian> <20141121084356.GA30945@jocasta.intra> <20141121095428.GA20625@debian.math.u-bordeaux1.fr> <20141121113102.GA31517@jocasta.intra> <20141121120558.GA6738@debian.bordeaux.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gKMricLos+KVdGMg" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59419) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrruo-0002zV-Hw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:22:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrruk-0002Aa-4F for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:22:38 -0500 Received: from de.cellform.com ([88.217.224.109]:53753 helo=jocasta.intra) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrruj-0002A6-NB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:22:34 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141121120558.GA6738@debian.bordeaux.inria.fr> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 01:05:58PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:31:02PM +0100, John Darrington wrote: > I don't know what this sentance means. =20 Do something similar as my last patch on wip-libreoffice: Add a line (supported-systems `("x86_64-linux")) to the nss package. =20 No idea if this would be enough. =20 Personally, I still prefer to work bottom-up by adding dependencies fi= rst (actually, I usually do a depth-first traversal of the dependency grap= h). =20 I will do what you suggested. But like you say, it would seem sensible to = me, if this entire branch is built only for x86_64, at least for the time being. J' --=20 PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3=20 fingerprint =3D 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key. --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlRvdMwACgkQimdxnC3oJ7NHQACfRgmbPT8H0fv53kQxptxB8kAQ K3UAn05HcwjJUMXXh1AYeV4wjDXOBeFf =e7df -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gKMricLos+KVdGMg--