From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: wip-libreoffice
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:54:28 +0100
Message-ID: <20141121095428.GA20625@debian.math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
References: <20141113180141.GA1223@jocasta.intra>
	<20141114184431.GA4323@debian>
	<20141114191738.GA14298@jocasta.intra>
	<20141118224427.GA26820@debian>
	<20141119061650.GA4201@jocasta.intra>
	<20141120225608.GA14628@debian>
	<20141121084356.GA30945@jocasta.intra>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52262)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1XrkvN-0006GU-GE
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 04:54:52 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1XrkvE-0005Ei-V7
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 04:54:45 -0500
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:64460)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1XrkvE-0005ER-LC
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 04:54:36 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20141121084356.GA30945@jocasta.intra>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 09:43:56AM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> s86_64-linux ??  "s" ?  Did you mean to type "x" ?

Yes.

> I thought you said a few days back that the evaluations would only run on x86_64
> at least to start with.  

Well, I added a line to libreoffice to make it build only on x86_64, at the
package level, not at the hydra level.

> BTW, where do you see these results?  According to hydra.gnu.org, the wip-libreoffice
> branch has never been evaluated.

You need to click on the branch and then on "Evaluation errors". This shows
an error message from your nss package; I do not quite understand why this
already happens on hydra, and not when offloading the build of the nss package.
You could try to replace this test by a supported-systems stance already.

Andreas