From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Denhardt Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ttf-symbola. [gnu.org #954922] Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 22:28:46 -0500 Message-ID: <20141119032846.12950.88452@vulcan.local.tld> References: <87iojcdp53.fsf@gmail.com> <20141023062654.GB6636@debian> <8761farhzp.fsf@gmail.com> <20141023173605.466.47994@rook> <87wq7qatee.fsf@gmail.com> <20141024065236.7150.29212@vulcan.local.tld> <87vbmi6emu.fsf@gnu.org> <20141116192756.22656.57197@vulcan.local.tld> <87egt2df8y.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="===============5338186788123597342==" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53112) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqvxF-0007bC-Kj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 22:29:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqvxB-0004Lz-4v for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 22:29:17 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87egt2df8y.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, licensing@fsf.org, Alex Kost --===============5338186788123597342== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (sending this to both the fsf and the guix-devel mailing list) Quoting Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2014-11-16 16:09:33) > Ian Denhardt skribis: > = > > Quoting Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2014-11-13 15:15:37) > >> Did you hear from them? > > > > Finally, yes. Here's the full response: > = > Great, thanks. > = > > Quoting Donald R Robertson III (2014-11-11 10:57:53) > = > [...] > = > >> The best course of action would be to contact the author to try and > >> clear up these issues. As you can see from our license list > >> , however, there > >> isn't a font license that we could really recommend that would cover t= he > >> same ground as what the author has outlined. But we could work with him > >> to try and get a better licensing situation. If you think it is worth > >> pursuing, please let us know and we will contact them > = > It=E2=80=99s probably worth pursuing, although I can imagine they=E2=80= =99d rather spend > a reasonable effort on it. Alright, I think we should contact him. My guess is he's not likely to be very familiar with GNU/Linux or the Free Software community in general (in addition to the licensing thing, the zip file contains a .docx). I feel like if I draft a letter myself I'm likely to assume too much knowledge. Don, if the developers here agree, I'd appreciate it if you'd contact the author, or perhaps draft a letter at least. -Ian --===============5338186788123597342== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: signature Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"; charset="us-ascii" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJUbA5uAAoJEPZUuMfUyjy4+64QAMVS+HkYg2PKVVnCU5IhoyZl y2lc5/VmymSmYyQUUnoKSoqDB0t5PpzdIhiuE2lIU72tbE8Z0mC2/xG0MmTg2Lm8 We1v5hHASK45RJ0aVwxQvaV0WZUhet80jOMZhJ10GdzSMb7pnDiZw5WhFeenFUwv Cp12GZ8JuEMbDi21FWbBocDKRvOzTDvzxkbqCMO21eLQfzahfpKDOenq0tq06XeK 15pClNEe5U3CkqFd5GckTVSKzA4hc7B6JDX0HcKMHksroRhWyc1bcZYjxW87CI03 YIVBeZgVlGFLJdYHg6Gm9Hc0ujeZBmKyvCbKaDKq+Qfxdo7G9YusF9MwBCiG5ixP RosgiorXzQ9kgVnlYgJdLv0SORiZAW9gb3gGUnQ5hYXCW3t44UDT3EzSdGPZ93NW awFR2hD1FuP7qjVPk7lh5xkVyvtCCnQ8FB2/cqvnqW3OyV7SIEocEV/fk8gNWcvj hIMWy9FXtlqQ7ZcyRZERzeiyntIEsmLt+XQSvrnAtK5xM9OwPpoQ5ylktfioO/oP 0Q0TCduW/NZmqYKCDmh7qN2EuXuusBXqposCp6kydtQY03lB98TDaSDN4KL0Yjwk QtzUdKknXm8sePB/zdc+dfJ6BdLQSFgjBg/lqf5z07b7dbuUFnVbFUuk/0fpkmf5 Aws8kA11SPopkVRTrgUk =/d7t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --===============5338186788123597342==--