From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Libtool Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 10:26:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20141109092619.GA8425@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50763) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnOlT-0008Qv-6H for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 04:26:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnOlL-0003Gd-NV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 04:26:31 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:58043) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnOlL-0003GY-EC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 04:26:23 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello, I need a newer libtool, and thought it would have to go into core-updates. But: $ guix refresh -l libtool Building the following 93 packages would ensure 162 dependent packages are rebuilt So should I update in master instead? Andreas