From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: kde: Add kdelibs.
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:51:06 +0100
Message-ID: <20141107145106.GA12686@debian.math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
References: <CAKrPhPOs3DFJQvb8zZ4vSWvJ7-uW1o8k1XLB_YXbh-ZKsXDA0g@mail.gmail.com>
	<87tx2d2ykt.fsf@gnu.org> <87ioitwfxf.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CAKrPhPP-qN=c7=0PD_wCzyCkEaHwwCCA79OsHSXrdxj364Ag-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141105211818.GA1181@debian> <20141105232032.GA24522@debian>
	<871tpglfg2.fsf@gnu.org> <20141106223744.GA15793@debian>
	<87tx2b8j00.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50229)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1Xmksv-0004V6-KL
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:51:41 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1Xmksj-0008HL-Uz
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:51:33 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87tx2b8j00.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org>

On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 10:20:15AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Our ld-wrapper is ineffective when the .so file names are passed
> directly like this.  That is, ld-wrapper adds -rpath for any -l switch,
> but it does not add -rpath for libraries whose absolute file name is
> specified.
> 
> That could be easily fixed, but in core-updates.
> 
> > But no "-Wl,-rpath" despite
> >    -DCMAKE_INSTALL_RPATH_USE_LINK_PATH=TRUE
> > Does this mean that this option only honours paths coming from "-l", while
> > at the same time using "-l" is unusual with cmake?
> 
> Uh.  While we can improve ld-wrapper, the best would of course be to get
> CMake to do the right thing...

Following our discussion, I think that indeed the flag
   -DCMAKE_INSTALL_RPATH_USE_LINK_PATH=TRUE
does nothing at all, and that our ld-wrapper is doing all the work indeed.

Andreas