From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: [ART] Background image for GRUB
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 18:05:38 +0100
Message-ID: <20141106170538.GA10470@debian.bordeaux.inria.fr>
References: <54594B40.9040008@openmailbox.org> <545951BE.5080301@gnu.org>
	<87tx2d6aog.fsf@gnu.org> <545A2FAF.3030103@gnu.org>
	<87ppd12yjm.fsf@gnu.org> <545A9679.50503@openmailbox.org>
	<20141105213917.GA2402@debian> <545AB4E4.4000103@openmailbox.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60428)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1XmQVK-0006Jy-Bw
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:05:57 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1XmQVC-0006WF-Rj
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:05:50 -0500
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:49507)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1XmQVC-0006Vn-Hs
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:05:42 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <545AB4E4.4000103@openmailbox.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Felipe =?iso-8859-15?Q?L=F3pez?= <felipe.lopez@openmailbox.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 06:38:12PM -0500, Felipe López wrote:
> As for the frame, GRUB 2 is supposed to be more flexible about the
> appearance of the elements in the screen. The frame can be removed and
> the boot options can be graphically enhanced. However, I'm using GRUB
> legacy appearance because, as far as I know, the theming features of
> GRUB 2 are still in development and may not be stable. I've seen that
> other distros use the GRUB 2 default appearance, which is the same as
> GRUB legacy.

Okay, I agree it is more important to be stable than to get the last bit
of visual pleasure.

> Is the current gray difficult to read? If not, I'd prefer to leave it
> that way.

For me it is okay, but I would argue that the more contrast, the better!

Andreas