From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: Changing python-wrapper to handle lib/ etc.
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:07:15 +0100
Message-ID: <20141104130715.GA8411@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr>
References: <20141029222347.GE29707@debian> <87tx2lu2ed.fsf_-_@gnu.org>
	<20141102174450.GC6865@debian> <20141102213257.GA11661@debian>
	<CAKrPhPOWZpMeRVkHmBJ+=9Q7HMqJR6KC=o=x4emj3uTs4Ufqdw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141103101345.GA7788@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr>
	<20141103201928.GA20729@debian> <20141103204921.GA3867@debian>
	<20141103220646.GB28208@debian> <871tpjcnbt.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57383)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1Xldpf-00033B-Bd
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 08:07:42 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1XldpX-0000Ds-Qm
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 08:07:35 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <871tpjcnbt.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org>

Next step: When adding tk as an input to python, I get the followiing error.
tcl in place of tk poses no problem; is there another variable named tk
somewhere?

Backtrace:
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 578: 19 [map #<procedure 2bd4e10 at guix/packages.scm:796:30 (t-7629)> (# # # ...)]
In guix/packages.scm:
 655: 18 [expand-input # # # ...]
 613: 17 [cache # # #<procedure thunk ()>]
 862: 16 [thunk]
 794: 15 [bag->derivation # # #]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 576: 14 [map #<procedure 2bf93c0 at guix/packages.scm:796:30 (t-7629)> (# # # ...)]
In guix/packages.scm:
 655: 13 [expand-input # # # ...]
 613: 12 [cache # # #<procedure thunk ()>]
 862: 11 [thunk]
 794: 10 [bag->derivation # # #]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 578: 9 [map #<procedure 2bf91e0 at guix/packages.scm:796:30 (t-7629)> (# # # ...)]
In guix/packages.scm:
 670: 8 [expand-input # # # ...]
In guix/monads.scm:
 469: 7 [run-with-store # #<procedure 2cec1e0 at guix/gexp.scm:173:2 (store)> # ...]
In guix/gexp.scm:
 173: 6 [#<procedure 2bfae70 at guix/gexp.scm:173:2 (store)> #]
 173: 5 [#<procedure 3e5d900 at guix/gexp.scm:173:2 (natives)> ()]
 319: 4 [gexp->sexp #<gexp (begin # # #) 2bf9150> #:system "x86_64-linux" ...]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 578: 3 [map #<procedure reference->sexp (ref #:optional native?)> #]
In guix/gexp.scm:
 312: 2 [reference->sexp (# # # # ...) #f]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 578: 1 [map #<procedure 2bfae10 at guix/gexp.scm:313:24 (t-25791)> (# # # # ...)]
In guix/gexp.scm:
 287: 0 [reference->sexp # #f # ...]

guix/gexp.scm:287:2: In procedure reference->sexp:
guix/gexp.scm:287:2: Throw to key `vm-error' with args `(vm-run "VM: Stack overflow" ())'.


Andreas