From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: Font package naming convention Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 10:30:01 +0100 Message-ID: <20141103093001.GB7644@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> References: <87ioj1sccx.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87ppd9e6ah.fsf@gmail.com> <20141030191743.GB19999@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> <878ujxdxmj.fsf@gmail.com> <20141031175840.GA16902@debian> <87sii4q64v.fsf@gnu.org> <20141101095205.GB30939@debian> <87ioixo71g.fsf@gnu.org> <20141102174935.GF6865@debian> <87d294u0la.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33366) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlE5M-0004RY-Bc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 04:38:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlE5E-0005wq-Pb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 04:38:04 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d294u0la.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Alex Kost On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 09:53:21AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > If there’s rough consensus on this, the next step would be to write this > informal rule in the manual, and to update package names. > > Any volunteer? Alex? :-) I volunteer, as I feel responsible for the package guidelines. Andreas