From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Patch-shebangs phase and created binaries Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:45:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20141030124534.GB6721@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50614) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XkERm-0005Xb-6D for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:50:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xjp6f-0003Jf-W2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 08:45:46 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:50258) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xjp6f-0003JN-Mm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 08:45:37 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello, should the final patch-shebangs phase not include the generated output path (well, the bin subdirectory) in its $PATH? In texlive I see lines such as patch-shebang: ./texmf-dist/tex/luatex/lualibs/lualibs-compat.lua: warning: no binary for interpreter `texlua' found in $PATH The file starts with #!/usr/bin/env texlua and texlua is a binary created in the texlive output (actually, bin/texlua is a symbolic link to the elf binary bin/luatex). Andreas