From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add numpy Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 23:23:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20141029222347.GE29707@debian> References: <87bnoyk6g9.fsf@gnu.org> <87wq7kh70n.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xjbey-0001vt-CT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:24:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xjbeq-0004Ua-Su for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:24:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wq7kh70n.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: Guix-devel , Federico Beffa On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:34:48AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Ah right. And what if you again remove Python from ‘inputs’, and add > #:python ,python > to the arguments? > That means it will use the actual Python 3.x package, not the wrapper, > so everything will be visible. The downside is that there will be no > ‘python’ command, only ‘python3’. > > Perhaps the right fix will be to change ‘python-wrapper’ to symlink the > ‘lib’ sub-directory of ‘python’. As already stated, I think we should add python as a propagated input to python-wrapper. The symlinks are just needed between the differently named python and python3. Should we give this a try? Andreas