From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>
Subject: Re: Perl modules
Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 11:20:33 +0200
Message-ID: <20140511092032.GA3782@intra>
References: <20140511085638.GA15275@debian>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35713)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>) id 1WjPwA-00044m-AH
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 May 2014 05:20:54 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>) id 1WjPw5-0005MV-OS
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 May 2014 05:20:50 -0400
Received: from de.cellform.com ([88.217.224.109]:58323 helo=jocasta.intra)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>) id 1WjPw5-0005M1-Ce
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 May 2014 05:20:45 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140511085638.GA15275@debian>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 10:56:38AM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
     On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 09:24:42PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
     > All very reasonable. Let us go for this (and I should add a section =
to the
     > packaging guidelines later on).
    =20
     Months later, here is a proposed patch in British English. Do we have =
a rule
     on which spelling to use? British is what I learnt at school.
    =20
Ahh, but which variant of British English? Oxford or Cambridge?

     (I feel like starting a bikeshed discussion ;-).)

whichever, "bike shed" is two words.

J'
    =20


--=20
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3=20
fingerprint =3D 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.


--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlNvQN8ACgkQimdxnC3oJ7PiEgCeP0LpetvMyA5iUR6U1kF2Ip4O
mGgAn3UaIOkuskcw/CTYuMZZf3FxuItT
=1OIJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--