From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: GSoC status
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:00:34 +0200
Message-ID: <20140423170034.GB31638@debian>
References: <8738h4jkfu.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87oazsauno.fsf@yeeloong.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57068)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1Wd0Xz-0002pH-Gv
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:01:30 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1Wd0Xs-0007nC-2Y
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:01:23 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87oazsauno.fsf@yeeloong.lan>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge@gnu.org>, samuel.thibault@gnu.org, "Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@gnu.org>

On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:16:11PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> FWIW, I received that message (dated Wed, 09 Apr 2014 21:28:54 +0200),
> as I was on the CC list.  In fact, I received two copies of it.

I also received it. This looks like a case of very bad luck, where adding
more formal procedure would not have avoided the problem.

Andreas