From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: Searchable archive at MARC? Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 09:21:56 +0200 Message-ID: <20140402072156.GA22530@debian> References: <20140402054440.GR10315@marklar.spinoli.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53798) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WVFUy-0005Vm-Vc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 03:22:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WVFUo-0005Z1-8M for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 03:22:12 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:62533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WVFUn-0005XW-VP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 03:22:02 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140402054440.GR10315@marklar.spinoli.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Hank Leininger Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 01:44:40AM -0400, Hank Leininger wrote: > Would there be any objection to the guix lists being added? I am not in favour of any external body hosting copies of our mailing list. There is an archive at gnu, that is indexed by search engines, and I do not see which problem an additional copy solves. I am not a lawyer, but I also think it is illegal without the explicit permission of each and every poster, who holds the copyright to their contribution. Andreas