From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add lynx Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:04:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20140305100455.GA13118@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> References: <87a9d5m4jq.fsf@yeeloong.lan> <20140305090052.GA12643@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> <871tyhm1jo.fsf@yeeloong.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58377) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WL8hG-0001GD-KU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 05:05:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WL8h9-0005LS-By for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 05:05:06 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:54964) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WL8h9-0005L9-2v for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 05:04:59 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871tyhm1jo.fsf@yeeloong.lan> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 04:34:35AM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > It's fine with me, but what about w3m.scm, wget.scm, and gnuzilla.scm? > Should these all be moved as well? I noticed wget as probably misplaced. w3m would be good in web.scm as well. gnuzilla, as a gnu project, is one that I would leave in its own file. But all this is more an expression of taste than really argumented. So far, we have no coherent policy on which package goes into which file. Personally, I tend to regroup several packages into one file. So in the end, feel free to do as you prefer. Andreas