Re: Symlinks to generic names

[John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1037 bytes --]

On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 08:34:23AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
     John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au> skribis:
     
     > Some software (rightly or wrongly) tries to build with "lex" and "yacc" .  Guix does not provide these.
     > Instead we have "flex" and "bison".  Most operating systems have symbolic links lex -> flex and yacc -> bison.
     > Shouldn't we provide these too?
     
     We had a similar discussion for ‘cc’ vs. ‘gcc’, but in practice ‘cc’ has
     been rare enough that it’s not worth bothering.

     I believe Autoconf-based packages do not have any problems with ‘flex’
     and ‘bison’.  What package was it?  How hard is it to work around?
     
It's probably not too hard.  It just seems to me, that it makes more sense to do the 
workaround in 1 package, than in N.

J'

-- 
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]