From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: The Nixpkgs Monitor Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 13:02:56 +0100 Message-ID: <20140118120256.GA7593@debian> References: <87r48awug8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4UcG-0006l0-DA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:03:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4Uc7-0003rQ-QT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:03:08 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r48awug8.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:42:47PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > A great initiative that we could get inspiration from: the Nixpkgs > Monitor scans packages for updates à la ‘guix refresh’ (but not limited > to GNU packages), and also for CVEs. What is the limitation on scanning for updates only for GNU packages? Could the same logic not be used for other packages that do not contain part of the package version in their download uris, and maybe even others? Andreas