From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Darrington Subject: Re: [bug-womb] [gnu.org #881181] Re: [gnu.org #881518] Re: Package synopses and blurbs translation Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 07:38:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20140112063834.GA27714@intra> References: <87zjn26cyh.fsf@gnu.org> <201401112334.s0BNY1eu029773@freefriends.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58674) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2EhA-0002Gt-J4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 01:38:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2Eh6-00049d-Ab for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 01:38:52 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Karl Berry via RT Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, bug-womb@gnu.org --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 06:34:38PM -0500, Karl Berry via RT wrote: =20 On the other hand, having translations simultaneously happening in TP and www seems like a lot of headache to me. =20 I agree, and this is what I was alluding to in my previous emails - and in = some cases the work is not only being duplicated, but triplicated --- www, TP, a= nd independently by the packages themselves. And www translators will not, in general, be technically up to using TP. =20 That, I find hard to believe. TP requires no technical ability, beyond edi= ting the po files (either using a tool or a normal editor) and sending emails. = It is perhaps true that the TP robot is somewhat cumbersome - a web interface to= =20 compilment the current email interface might be a good idea. But like you = say, this will require cooperation between TP and whoever. Might this not be a = good opportunity to work together for a solution .... ? =20 J' =20 --=20 PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3=20 fingerprint =3D 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key. --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlLSOGkACgkQimdxnC3oJ7OjMgCeLZuRqno17Gjr89GANR7L8dA7 Yx0An3Jar1i73yGw5VchxgqHEb1xsH6R =tnUh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0--