From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: mesa in xorg.scm Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 08:50:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20131228075036.GA7402@debian> References: <20131226125041.GA27172@jocasta.intra> <87ppoiq7a5.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38536) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VwofY-0000e0-Nd for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 02:50:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VwofS-0006TO-Ho for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 02:50:48 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ppoiq7a5.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 11:05:22PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > John Darrington skribis: > > I wondered why mesa is defined in the module xorg.scm since it really doesn't have > > much to do with X, other than X is one graphics system it supports. > > > > Wouldn't the module gl.scm be a better location? > > Probably yes, although several Xorg components (mostly drivers, uh?) > seem to depend on it. Indeed, when I started packaging x.org, I put all of its files, as well as the dependencies we had not yet packaged, into xorg.scm. But I have nothing against moving packages around. Andreas