Test failures with 0.9.31

all messages for Guix-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed

* Test failures with 0.9.31
@ 2013-10-30 19:45 Andreas Enge
  2013-10-30 21:42 ` Ludovic Courtès
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Enge @ 2013-10-30 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: libmicrohttpd; +Cc: guix-devel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 395 bytes --]

Hello,

when upgrading from 0.9.30 to 0.9.31 in the GNU Guix distribution,
where all packages are built in a sparsely populated chroot, about
half the tests in testcurl fail with messages similar to
   Failed to bind to port 11080: Address already in use

I attach src/testcurl/test-suite.log. With the exact same setting,
0.9.30 passes all its tests. Our curl version is curl-7.28.1.

Andreas


[-- Attachment #2: test-suite.log --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5778 bytes --]

=======================================================
   libmicrohttpd 0.9.31: src/testcurl/test-suite.log
=======================================================

# TOTAL: 33
# PASS:  15
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  18
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0

.. contents:: :depth: 2

FAIL: test_get
==============

Failed to bind to port 11080: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 11080: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 11080: Address already in use
Error (code: 3)

FAIL: test_get_sendfile
=======================

Failed to bind to port 11080: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 33)

FAIL: test_put
==============

Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 32)

FAIL: test_large_put
====================

Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 32)

FAIL: test_get11
================

Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 112)

FAIL: test_get_sendfile11
=========================

Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 32)

FAIL: test_put11
================

Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 32)

FAIL: test_large_put11
======================

Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 32)

FAIL: test_get_chunked
======================

Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 32)

FAIL: test_iplimit11
====================

Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 32)

FAIL: test_get_response_cleanup
===============================

Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 80)

FAIL: perf_get
==============

Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Sequential GETs using internal select: 10869.565217 requests/s
Sequential GETs using thread with select: 3787.878788 requests/s
Sequential GETs using thread pool with select: 7936.507937 requests/s
Sequential GETs using internal poll: 7575.757576 requests/s
Sequential GETs using thread with poll: 4901.960784 requests/s
Sequential GETs using thread pool with poll: 10416.666667 requests/s
Sequential GETs using internal epoll: 11904.761905 requests/s
Sequential GETs using thread pool with epoll: 11627.906977 requests/s
Error (code: 256)

FAIL: test_post
===============

Failed to bind to port 1082: Address already in use
Error (code: 256)

FAIL: test_postform
===================

Failed to bind to port 1080: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 33)

FAIL: test_post_loop
====================

Failed to bind to port 1080: Address already in use
internal select: Sequential POSTs (http/1.0) 1000000.000000/s
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
multithreaded post: Sequential POSTs (http/1.0) 1000000.000000/s
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
thread with pool: Sequential POSTs (http/1.0) 1000000.000000/s
..........
external select: Sequential POSTs (http/1.0) 10869.565217/s
Error (code: 33)

FAIL: test_post11
=================

Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1080: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1082: Address already in use
Error (code: 33057)

FAIL: test_postform11
=====================

Failed to bind to port 1080: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1082: Address already in use
Error (code: 289)

FAIL: test_post_loop11
======================

Failed to bind to port 1080: Address already in use
internal select: Sequential POSTs (http/1.1) 1000000.000000/s
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
multithreaded post: Sequential POSTs (http/1.1) 1000000.000000/s
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
thread with pool: Sequential POSTs (http/1.1) 1000000.000000/s
Failed to bind to port 1082: Address already in use
external select: Sequential POSTs (http/1.1) 1000000.000000/s
Error (code: 289)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Test failures with 0.9.31
  2013-10-30 19:45 Test failures with 0.9.31 Andreas Enge
@ 2013-10-30 21:42 ` Ludovic Courtès
       [not found]   ` <87li1ah1v4.fsf-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2013-10-30 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andreas Enge; +Cc: guix-devel, libmicrohttpd

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> when upgrading from 0.9.30 to 0.9.31 in the GNU Guix distribution,
> where all packages are built in a sparsely populated chroot, about
> half the tests in testcurl fail with messages similar to
>    Failed to bind to port 11080: Address already in use

Sounds like tests may need to be run sequentially.  Did you try
#:parallel-tests? #f ?

Ludo’.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

[parent not found: <87li1ah1v4.fsf-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org>]

* Re: Test failures with 0.9.31
       [not found]   ` <87li1ah1v4.fsf-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org>
@ 2013-10-30 22:07     ` Andreas Enge
  2013-10-30 22:20       ` Ludovic Courtès
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Enge @ 2013-10-30 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: guix-devel-mXXj517/zsQ, libmicrohttpd-mXXj517/zsQ

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:42:39PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Sounds like tests may need to be run sequentially.  Did you try
> #:parallel-tests? #f ?

Yes, that was it! Thanks for spotting this. I will apply it immediately to
libextractor also.

Andreas

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Test failures with 0.9.31
  2013-10-30 22:07     ` Andreas Enge
@ 2013-10-30 22:20       ` Ludovic Courtès
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2013-10-30 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andreas Enge; +Cc: guix-devel, libmicrohttpd

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:42:39PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Sounds like tests may need to be run sequentially.  Did you try
>> #:parallel-tests? #f ?
>
> Yes, that was it! Thanks for spotting this. I will apply it immediately to
> libextractor also.

That means our fellow libmicrohttpd hackers (hi! ;-)) may want to add
‘serial-tests’ to the ‘AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE’ line.

Ludo’.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-10-30 22:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-10-30 19:45 Test failures with 0.9.31 Andreas Enge
2013-10-30 21:42 ` Ludovic Courtès
     [not found]   ` <87li1ah1v4.fsf-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-30 22:07     ` Andreas Enge
2013-10-30 22:20       ` Ludovic Courtès

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.