* Test failures with 0.9.31
@ 2013-10-30 19:45 Andreas Enge
2013-10-30 21:42 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Enge @ 2013-10-30 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libmicrohttpd; +Cc: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 395 bytes --]
Hello,
when upgrading from 0.9.30 to 0.9.31 in the GNU Guix distribution,
where all packages are built in a sparsely populated chroot, about
half the tests in testcurl fail with messages similar to
Failed to bind to port 11080: Address already in use
I attach src/testcurl/test-suite.log. With the exact same setting,
0.9.30 passes all its tests. Our curl version is curl-7.28.1.
Andreas
[-- Attachment #2: test-suite.log --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5778 bytes --]
=======================================================
libmicrohttpd 0.9.31: src/testcurl/test-suite.log
=======================================================
# TOTAL: 33
# PASS: 15
# SKIP: 0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL: 18
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
.. contents:: :depth: 2
FAIL: test_get
==============
Failed to bind to port 11080: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 11080: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 11080: Address already in use
Error (code: 3)
FAIL: test_get_sendfile
=======================
Failed to bind to port 11080: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 33)
FAIL: test_put
==============
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 32)
FAIL: test_large_put
====================
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 32)
FAIL: test_get11
================
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 112)
FAIL: test_get_sendfile11
=========================
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 32)
FAIL: test_put11
================
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 32)
FAIL: test_large_put11
======================
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 32)
FAIL: test_get_chunked
======================
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 32)
FAIL: test_iplimit11
====================
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 32)
FAIL: test_get_response_cleanup
===============================
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 80)
FAIL: perf_get
==============
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Sequential GETs using internal select: 10869.565217 requests/s
Sequential GETs using thread with select: 3787.878788 requests/s
Sequential GETs using thread pool with select: 7936.507937 requests/s
Sequential GETs using internal poll: 7575.757576 requests/s
Sequential GETs using thread with poll: 4901.960784 requests/s
Sequential GETs using thread pool with poll: 10416.666667 requests/s
Sequential GETs using internal epoll: 11904.761905 requests/s
Sequential GETs using thread pool with epoll: 11627.906977 requests/s
Error (code: 256)
FAIL: test_post
===============
Failed to bind to port 1082: Address already in use
Error (code: 256)
FAIL: test_postform
===================
Failed to bind to port 1080: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Error (code: 33)
FAIL: test_post_loop
====================
Failed to bind to port 1080: Address already in use
internal select: Sequential POSTs (http/1.0) 1000000.000000/s
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
multithreaded post: Sequential POSTs (http/1.0) 1000000.000000/s
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
thread with pool: Sequential POSTs (http/1.0) 1000000.000000/s
..........
external select: Sequential POSTs (http/1.0) 10869.565217/s
Error (code: 33)
FAIL: test_post11
=================
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1080: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1082: Address already in use
Error (code: 33057)
FAIL: test_postform11
=====================
Failed to bind to port 1080: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
Failed to bind to port 1082: Address already in use
Error (code: 289)
FAIL: test_post_loop11
======================
Failed to bind to port 1080: Address already in use
internal select: Sequential POSTs (http/1.1) 1000000.000000/s
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
multithreaded post: Sequential POSTs (http/1.1) 1000000.000000/s
Failed to bind to port 1081: Address already in use
thread with pool: Sequential POSTs (http/1.1) 1000000.000000/s
Failed to bind to port 1082: Address already in use
external select: Sequential POSTs (http/1.1) 1000000.000000/s
Error (code: 289)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Test failures with 0.9.31
2013-10-30 19:45 Test failures with 0.9.31 Andreas Enge
@ 2013-10-30 21:42 ` Ludovic Courtès
[not found] ` <87li1ah1v4.fsf-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2013-10-30 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Enge; +Cc: guix-devel, libmicrohttpd
Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:
> when upgrading from 0.9.30 to 0.9.31 in the GNU Guix distribution,
> where all packages are built in a sparsely populated chroot, about
> half the tests in testcurl fail with messages similar to
> Failed to bind to port 11080: Address already in use
Sounds like tests may need to be run sequentially. Did you try
#:parallel-tests? #f ?
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Test failures with 0.9.31
[not found] ` <87li1ah1v4.fsf-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org>
@ 2013-10-30 22:07 ` Andreas Enge
2013-10-30 22:20 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Enge @ 2013-10-30 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: guix-devel-mXXj517/zsQ, libmicrohttpd-mXXj517/zsQ
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:42:39PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Sounds like tests may need to be run sequentially. Did you try
> #:parallel-tests? #f ?
Yes, that was it! Thanks for spotting this. I will apply it immediately to
libextractor also.
Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Test failures with 0.9.31
2013-10-30 22:07 ` Andreas Enge
@ 2013-10-30 22:20 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2013-10-30 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Enge; +Cc: guix-devel, libmicrohttpd
Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:42:39PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Sounds like tests may need to be run sequentially. Did you try
>> #:parallel-tests? #f ?
>
> Yes, that was it! Thanks for spotting this. I will apply it immediately to
> libextractor also.
That means our fellow libmicrohttpd hackers (hi! ;-)) may want to add
‘serial-tests’ to the ‘AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE’ line.
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-10-30 22:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-10-30 19:45 Test failures with 0.9.31 Andreas Enge
2013-10-30 21:42 ` Ludovic Courtès
[not found] ` <87li1ah1v4.fsf-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-30 22:07 ` Andreas Enge
2013-10-30 22:20 ` Ludovic Courtès
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.