From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: GCC front-ends Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 11:39:44 +0100 Message-ID: <20131027103944.GA8019@debian> References: <87wqlfutme.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87hacijnke.fsf@gnu.org> <87ppr4giie.fsf@karetnikov.org> <8738nzdig1.fsf@gnu.org> <87hacdmyc2.fsf_-_@karetnikov.org> <87bo2bkd7f.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56574) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VaNlH-00067O-S0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 06:40:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VaNlA-0006Zf-Ii for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 06:39:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87bo2bkd7f.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:08:04PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > That’s a bug, which may have been fixed in 4.8.2 no? I’d rather not > workaround that if it’s been/being fixed. Speaking of which, should we maybe switch to 4.8.2 for building the distribution? Now would be the right time to update core-updates. Mark also suggested a new set of bootstrap-tarballs with a common date and common versions of all programs for all architectures, including mips. Andreas