From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: LAPACK: tests fail; non-free files Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 13:57:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20131023115728.GA17339@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> References: <87ob6gpd5k.fsf@karetnikov.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51545) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VYx4F-00079l-VH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:57:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VYx4A-0001OR-47 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:57:39 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:53332) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VYx49-0001O6-R3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:57:34 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ob6gpd5k.fsf@karetnikov.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nikita Karetnikov Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello Nikita, On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:08:55PM +0400, Nikita Karetnikov wrote: > The attached patch requires this one [1]. I would suggest to add lapack only after the fortran compiler is in master. You might wish to put the variable into maths.scm. > 2. These files are not free: > lapacke/example/example_DGESV_rowmajor.c > lapacke/example/example_ZGESV_rowmajor.c > Should I report upstream or simply remove them? Debian removes them: http://ftp-master.metadata.debian.org/changelogs/main/l/lapack/unstable_copyright So does Fedora: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/scm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130325/987558.html I would suggest to do the same; if you feel reporting it, it would be interes- ting to see how upstream reacts. Andreas