From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Qt Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 21:05:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20131008190520.GA31264@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53172) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTcbA-0001hq-9N for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 15:05:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTcb0-0003JJ-Ek for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 15:05:36 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:57285) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTcb0-0003Iu-5I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 15:05:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi, I just pushed a patch for Qt 5.1.1. It builds on my machine, but as there is no application using it so far, it may or may not work. Also, the build uses sse/sse2/... instructions according to what is available on the processor; we might wish to disable all or at least the most advanced of them in the long run. For the time being, I would leave them in, and once we have a qt application, check whether it works on different processors. A next step would be to add qt 4.8.5, as I think this version is still used more widely so far. Andreas