From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: Naming scheme for Python packages Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 23:32:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20130904213224.GA8767@debian> References: <87li3c8g56.fsf@gnu.org> <20130904210836.GB8425@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHKgm-0005Nk-GV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 17:32:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHKge-0002q1-Sm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 17:32:36 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130904210836.GB8425@debian> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Apparently, I am getting tired. Especially the variable names must be distinct: There is python-pytz (as a module for python=python-3) and python2-pytz (as a module for python-2) inside the same scheme module. Unless we wish to create scheme modules python2 and python3, which I find rather awkward. And if we end up using renamers, it all boils down to the same thing again. Andreas