From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: Naming scheme for Python packages
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 23:16:31 +0200
Message-ID: <20130904211631.GB8546@debian>
References: <E1VHJTB-0006ys-7X@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87li3c8g56.fsf@gnu.org>
	<52279D78.7080802@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53862)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1VHKRO-0002PG-Co
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 17:16:49 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1VHKRH-0006j4-3k
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 17:16:42 -0400
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:64944)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1VHKRG-0006j0-Qv
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 17:16:35 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52279D78.7080802@gmail.com>
List-Id: <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:52:08PM +0200, Cyril Roelandt wrote:
>   (define pytz
>     (package
>       (name "python-pytz")
>       ...))

> This is quite Debianish. I like it.

But the alternative (as I suggested in the packaging guidelines) is as
debianish:

>   (define python-pytz
>     (package
>       (name "python-pytz")
>       ...))

We agree on the outer experience, the question is now how to name variables
internally (which is, admittedly, less important).

Andreas