From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Add libaprutil. Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 21:34:22 +0200 Message-ID: <201307182134.22999.andreas@enge.fr> References: <1359142972-32585-1-git-send-email-tipecaml@gmail.com> <1359142972-32585-3-git-send-email-tipecaml@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50196) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UztyB-000794-8y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 15:34:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uzty8-0000ol-4F for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 15:34:31 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:64800) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uzty7-0000oQ-S8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 15:34:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1359142972-32585-3-git-send-email-tipecaml@gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org Am Freitag, 25. Januar 2013 schrieb Cyril Roelandt: > * gnu/packages/libapr: new variable. > gnu/packages/libapr.scm | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > +(define-public libaprutil While trying to update subversion, I come across libapr.scm. Unlike Debian, we normally do not add "lib" in front of the name for a library package. For instance, we use "cairo" instead of "libcairo". So I would suggest to rename the file to apr.scm, and the package libapr to apr. I am not sure for libaprutil, however, for which the official name is APR- util. Shall we use apr-util or aprutil to avoid the dash? Andreas