From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: Using GNUnet for binary package distribution Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:03:25 +0100 Message-ID: <201303211803.25387.andreas@enge.fr> References: <87620kykg6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35360) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UIiyW-0005XJ-7J for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:08:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UIitv-0003gq-Jw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:03:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87620kykg6.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: bug-guix@gnu.org Cc: gnunet-developers@gnu.org Am Donnerstag, 21. M=C3=A4rz 2013 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s: > I=E2=80=99m interested in providing a /practical/ decentralized distribut= ion > model. It seems to me that GNUnet=E2=80=99s DHT would be the most approp= riate > (as opposed to AFS). WDYT? This sounds very interesting indeed! On the guix side, it would be useful=20 to start by packaging gnunet. I intended to do so, but am stuck with=20 failing tests in libextractor, which I did not find the time to debug. Andreas