From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: PKG_CONFIG_PATH Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 13:55:29 +0100 Message-ID: <201303041355.30076.andreas@enge.fr> References: <201303032051.00691.andreas@enge.fr> <87621818rr.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51551) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCUvh-0002wh-Cx for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 07:55:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCUve-00033j-TD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 07:55:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87621818rr.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org Am Sonntag, 3. M=C3=A4rz 2013 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s: > Andreas Enge skribis: > > This is because it is not contained in a subdirectory lib/pkgconfig, > > but in share/pkgconfig. Should we add "share/pkgconfig" to the lines > Yes, it=E2=80=99s non-conventional, but it won=E2=80=99t hurt to add it. Done; it seems to be the convention with the xorg packages. This leaves me in a slight mess with my xorg branch, which was based on=20 master, and which now needs core-updates. So the xorg branch contains=20 modifications in master that are not in core-updates, and simply rebasing=20 it on core-updates does not work. Shall we merge master into core-updates=20 again? Will we merge back core-updates any time soon? Andreas