From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swedebugia Subject: Re: Re-approaching package tagging Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 12:55:50 +0100 Message-ID: <1d070c15-0004-2776-2152-7a4dfa4d2712@riseup.net> References: <875zvsq8ov.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87imzrgjit.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8fa7ums.fsf@dustycloud.org> <871s6dwob2.fsf@gnu.org> <87pntwskgn.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8f8xy6u.fsf@dustycloud.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48182) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZwpU-0001RL-FP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 06:49:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZwpR-0000P6-9D for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 06:49:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87h8f8xy6u.fsf@dustycloud.org> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Christopher Lemmer Webber , =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=c3=a8s?= Cc: Guix Devel On 2018-12-20 11:57, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: snip > > I wonder for keywords that would be awkward to "force" into the > description if we could have an "extra keywords" section? Then we can > skip tagging, but in case a package's description didn't comfortably fit > that word, you can still find it by it. Then it's not separate tagging, > just extra words to find a package by that the description didn't say. > > WDYT? I like it. We could upstream those also to wikidata where they could be used as basis for categorization of software. -- Cheers Swedebugia