From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32958)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jRbDz-0005EZ-4E
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:45:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jRbDy-0007qS-Dm
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:45:02 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42668)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jRbDx-0007p7-UK
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:45:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jRbDx-0002ZH-Oz
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:45:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#40683] Re: [bug#40683] [PATCH] gnu: Add wireguard-module.
References: <20200417155855.6210-1-brice@waegenei.re>
In-Reply-To: <20200417155855.6210-1-brice@waegenei.re>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.40683.B40683.15876458569802@debbugs.gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 12:44:05 +0000
From: Brice Waegeneire <brice@waegenei.re>
Message-ID: <1cbec19178bb4184e32ebd497c22962a@waegenei.re>
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: 40683@debbugs.gnu.org, me@tobias.gr

Tobias,

>> +    (synopsis "WireGuard loadable kernel module for Linux 3.10
>> through 5.5")
>> +    (description "This is a loadable Linux kernel module for
>> WireGuard
>> +supporting kernel versions 3.10 through 5.5.  WireGuard was
>> added to Linux
>> +5.6.
> 
> I think we should say ‘Linux-Libre’ here (yes, even though it
> loads on any *Linux) but I'm never entirely sure.
> 
> [...]
> 
> LGTM with these changes, but curious what others think about
> ‘Linux’,

None of the similar packages like 'acpi-call-linux-module',
'rtl8812au-aircrack-ng-linux-module', 'ddcci-driver-linux' or 'zfs' use
“Linux-Libre” in their synopsis or description. So using “Linux” should 
be
good or an other patch should modify all of them.

Cheers,
- Brice