From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Raghav Gururajan" <raghavgururajan@disroot.org>
Subject: Re: Linphone
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:40:15 +0000
Message-ID: <1a12b798820d64de8aee3303eac19e44@disroot.org>
References: <20200325232950.59dd1b1e@scratchpost.org>
 <7aa517d42c2bd7b527712c73ca5eac58@disroot.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46649)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <raghavgururajan@disroot.org>) id 1jHRo6-0008TP-Jl
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:40:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <raghavgururajan@disroot.org>) id 1jHRo4-0005Mr-JH
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:40:22 -0400
Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:58510)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <raghavgururajan@disroot.org>)
 id 1jHRo4-0005MH-Df
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:40:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20200325232950.59dd1b1e@scratchpost.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel"
 <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hi Danny!=0A=0A> So I checked that directory and it indeed does not have =
that file.=0A> =0A> But it does have=0A> /gnu/store/m92m6bg0xcl28djxg8h97=
sszf3gdl42r-bctoolbox-4.3.1/share/bctoolbox/cmake/bctoolboxConfig.cm=0A> =
ke=0A> -- note the different case of the name.=0A=0AThanks so much for sp=
otting this.=0A=0A> So I'd say either linphone-desktop or bctoolbox has t=
he case wrong in some cmake file.=0A=0AI believe it is linphone-desktop a=
nd not bctoolbox. Because other Belledone-Communications packages has bct=
oolboox as required dependency and they all work fine. So I think the iss=
ue is with linphone-desktop.=0A=0A> linphone-desktop has the following li=
ne:=0A> =0A> ./CMakeLists.txt: include("${EP_bctoolbox_CONFIG_DIR}/BcTool=
boxConfig.cmake")=0A> =0A> ... and that line is not going to work as-is.=
=0A=0AYeah, that's true. Is there a way to patch this, with-in package de=
finition? Could you help me with the syntax?=0A=0AThank you!=0A=0ARegards=
,=0ARG.