From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46414) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dNPUQ-0007lo-Sp for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:11:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dNPUL-0002k9-Vq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:11:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55785) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dNPUL-0002jw-Sz for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:11:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dNPUL-0001P9-Nn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:11:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#27428] [PATCH] gnu: gsl: Update to 2.4. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 20:10:45 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1a1bdf27.AEAALq4UWmUAAAAAAAAAAAOtUOAAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZSDbL@mailjet.com> <877f06ppcx.fsf@fastmail.com> <20170620195538.GB2768@macbook42.flashner.co.il> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Efraim Flashner Message-ID: <1ECD9D60-75E9-4F31-844E-86EFCBFE4EAC@flashner.co.il> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Arun Isaac Cc: 27428@debbugs.gnu.org On June 20, 2017 11:09:30 PM GMT+03:00, Arun Isaac wrote: > >Efraim Flashner writes: > >>> Marius Bakke writes: >>>=20 >>> > Arun Isaac writes: >>> > >>> >> * gnu/packages/maths=2Escm (gsl): Update to 2=2E4=2E >>> > >>> > This should also mention that #:parallel-tests? is now gone=2E > >Noted=2E I'll add this before pushing=2E > >> From digging around gsl's bug reports it looked like the devs there >> don't have access to some of those machines either, or access to >enough >> of them to make sure the code works on different hardware=2E >> >> Unfortunately it still fails on my machine, with the first failure >still >> on the linalg directory=2E Its on my things to do list to try to fix >some >> of the tests but I haven't gotten around to it yet=2E > >In that case, shall I just assume status quo with respect to tests on >these machines and push this patch? Yeah, I'm not going to have time to work on it for quite a while=2E --=20 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E