* Strange behavior using guix git authenticate
@ 2024-11-22 18:24 sebastien
2024-11-27 18:39 ` Simon Tournier
2024-11-27 22:12 ` Attila Lendvai
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: sebastien @ 2024-11-22 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3592 bytes --]
Hi,
I try to follow the tutorial on guix blog (https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2024/authenticate-your-git-checkouts/) to authenticate my commit for a personal channel. I have some feedback to do, and possible missing info. for padawan like me.
- A / There are no information for pushing keyring branch to origin repo. Commit for keyring come before Introductory commit so pushing keyring to <yourforge> repository failed. Talking with ludovic, the tutorial doesn't say that pre-push hook need to be desactivated to push on <yourforge> repository.
- B / I follow the tutorial on an existing channel repo, two times, because i made some errors that imply : a reset --hard of the repo, the delete of the keyring branch, removing the authenticate line in git/config, removing the post-merge and pre-push hook. But, now my repository is probably in a strange state and guix git authenticate failed even if the commit is a correct descendant of the introductory commit. More info after :
An example with one commit after Introductory Commit (fcf50534c7fec17e689597cfaaec9f4cedb397de) :
---
commit 2eddf958be68a5a4df7fd43feb604707472f89a4 (HEAD -> master, origin/master)gpg: Signature faite le mar. 19 nov. 2024 23:05:17 CET
gpg: avec la clef RSA 41D051592D59A9C07AB4DF25DC55CB6B7043416E
gpg: Bonne signature de « xxx <xxx> » [ultime]
Author: xxx <xxx>
Date: Tue Nov 19 23:05:17 2024 +0100
add README
commit fcf50534c7fec17e689597cfaaec9f4cedb397de
gpg: Signature faite le mar. 19 nov. 2024 22:55:40 CET
gpg: avec la clef RSA 41D051592D59A9C07AB4DF25DC55CB6B7043416E
gpg: Bonne signature de « xxx <> » [ultime]
Author: xxx <>
Date: Tue Nov 19 22:55:40 2024 +0100
Introductory commit.
---
In my .git/config i have :
[core]repositoryformatversion = 0
filemode = true
bare = false
logallrefupdates = true
[remote "origin"]
url = git@codeberg.org:reycoseb/extra-guix-channel.git
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
[branch "master"]
remote = origin
merge = refs/heads/master
[guix "authentication"]
introduction-commit = fcf50534c7fec17e689597cfaaec9f4cedb397de
introduction-signer = 41D051592D59A9C07AB4DF25DC55CB6B7043416E
keyring = keyring
[branch "keyring"]
remote = origin
merge = refs/heads/keyring
I use a Yubikey with a specific subkey used to sign :
Signature key ....: 41D0 5159 2D59 A9C0 7AB4 DF25 DC55 CB6B 7043 416E created ....: 2020-09-01 12:13:40
Encryption key....: 04E1 4065 2E41 C847 4D7F B0EE D788 9EAF B20E C927
created ....: 2020-09-01 12:14:39
Authentication key: D57E C3C4 1288 E30D 17C1 290B 1DB9 AAD6 04D0 60C0
created ....: 2020-09-01 12:15:08
My .guix authorization file :
(authorizations (version 0) ;current file format version
(("41D0 5159 2D59 A9C0 7AB4 DF25 DC55 CB6B 7043 416E"
(name "xxx"))))
When i run guix git authenticate in my master branch, with yubikey activated, i have
Authentification des commits fcf5053 à 2eddf95 (1 nouveaux commits)...guix git: erreur : commit 2eddf958be68a5a4df7fd43feb604707472f89a4 not signed by an authorized key: 41D0 5159 2D59 A9C0 7AB4 DF25 DC55 CB6B 7043 416E
Strange ? Also, the git push command say the same thing. If you have
I use guix 4c56d0c URL du dépôt : https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
branche : master
commit : 4c56d0cccdc44e12484b26332715f54768738c5f
Best regards,
Sebastien RC.
[-- Attachment #1.1.2.1: Type: text/html, Size: 9014 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #1.2: publickey - s.rey.coyrehourcq@proton.me - 0xC3237850.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 669 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 249 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Strange behavior using guix git authenticate
2024-11-22 18:24 Strange behavior using guix git authenticate sebastien
@ 2024-11-27 18:39 ` Simon Tournier
2024-11-27 20:29 ` sebastien via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2024-11-27 22:12 ` Attila Lendvai
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Simon Tournier @ 2024-11-27 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sebastien, guix-devel
Hi Sébastien,
On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 at 18:24, sebastien <ml-dev@reycoyrehourcq.me> wrote:
> Authentification des commits fcf5053 à 2eddf95 (1 nouveaux commits)...guix git: erreur : commit 2eddf958be68a5a4df7fd43feb604707472f89a4 not signed by an authorized key: 41D0 5159 2D59 A9C0 7AB4 DF25 DC55 CB6B 7043 416E
If we speak about [1], I think the mistake comes from a typo in the
name: ’s’ instead of ’z’.
.guix-authorisations -> .guix-authorizations
Because of that, the procedure ’commit-authorized-keys’ returns an empty
list.
Renaming, does it fix your issue?
That’s said, maybe we could improve the UI by checking these two
requirements for authorization: a file name ’.guix-authorizations’ and a
branch ’keyring’ (although ’keyring’ is a key passed around).
Cheers,
simon
1: https://gitlab.huma-num.fr/gt-notebook/workshop/je_notebook_2024/atelier-bdc-notebooks/gt-guix-doc-channel/-/blob/f0d0930d00afdb62544f15ad69cac1be776ef7bc/.guix-authorisations
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Strange behavior using guix git authenticate
2024-11-27 18:39 ` Simon Tournier
@ 2024-11-27 20:29 ` sebastien via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: sebastien via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution. @ 2024-11-27 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Simon Tournier; +Cc: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1537 bytes --]
Hi Simon,
I'm feeling so stupid, sorry about that ... working late is never a good idea ...
I redo the tutorial and now everything run fine, thanks \o/ !
There is also the "pre-push" hook to change a little because keyring cannot be validated :
git push -f --set-upstream origin keyring --no-verify
Best regards,
SR
Le mercredi 27 novembre 2024 à 7:39 PM, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>
> Hi Sébastien,
>
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 at 18:24, sebastien ml-dev@reycoyrehourcq.me wrote:
>
> > Authentification des commits fcf5053 à 2eddf95 (1 nouveaux commits)...guix git: erreur : commit 2eddf958be68a5a4df7fd43feb604707472f89a4 not signed by an authorized key: 41D0 5159 2D59 A9C0 7AB4 DF25 DC55 CB6B 7043 416E
>
>
> If we speak about [1], I think the mistake comes from a typo in the
> name: ’s’ instead of ’z’.
>
> .guix-authorisations -> .guix-authorizations
>
>
> Because of that, the procedure ’commit-authorized-keys’ returns an empty
> list.
>
> Renaming, does it fix your issue?
>
> That’s said, maybe we could improve the UI by checking these two
> requirements for authorization: a file name ’.guix-authorizations’ and a
> branch ’keyring’ (although ’keyring’ is a key passed around).
>
> Cheers,
> simon
>
> 1: https://gitlab.huma-num.fr/gt-notebook/workshop/je_notebook_2024/atelier-bdc-notebooks/gt-guix-doc-channel/-/blob/f0d0930d00afdb62544f15ad69cac1be776ef7bc/.guix-authorisations
[-- Attachment #1.2: publickey - s.rey.coyrehourcq@proton.me - 0xC3237850.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 669 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 249 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Strange behavior using guix git authenticate
2024-11-22 18:24 Strange behavior using guix git authenticate sebastien
2024-11-27 18:39 ` Simon Tournier
@ 2024-11-27 22:12 ` Attila Lendvai
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Attila Lendvai @ 2024-11-27 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sebastien; +Cc: guix-devel
> An example with one commit after Introductory Commit (fcf50534c7fec17e689597cfaaec9f4cedb397de) :
i suspect you may have been surprised by what's described (and fixed) in this unmerged patch:
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/50814
in short: git authenticate doesn't check anything on the intro commit, just takes it as-is. so, if your setup is broken, then it only complains for the *second* commit.
if enough time passes between the two commits, then it can cause quite some time-waste for the surprised padawans. well, or at least for padawans like yours truly.
--
• attila lendvai
• PGP: 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39
--
“Your task is not to seek for love, but merely to seek and find all the barriers within yourself that you have built against it.”
— Rumi (1207–1273)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-27 22:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-22 18:24 Strange behavior using guix git authenticate sebastien
2024-11-27 18:39 ` Simon Tournier
2024-11-27 20:29 ` sebastien via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2024-11-27 22:12 ` Attila Lendvai
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.