From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sirgazil Subject: Re: core-updates call for testing Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:08:02 +0000 Message-ID: <171ad600357.c127cae94161.4503436238440610400@zoho.com> References: <87pnbxg508.fsf@devup.no> <171aa339c16.dea1952b12162.1876835440526368620@zoho.com> <171ac449812.e08028a216256.2620619201410674037@zoho.com> <87eescg8ba.fsf@devup.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33324) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jS2kJ-000510-7V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 14:08:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jS2kH-0004a4-VR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 14:08:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87eescg8ba.fsf@devup.no> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel , help-guix ---- On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 16:25:13 +0000 Marius Bakke wrote ---- > sirgazil writes: > > > ---- On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 03:20:41 +0000 sirgazil wrote ---- > > > ---- On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 23:24:23 +0000 Marius Bakke wrote ---- > > > > Hello Guix! > > > > > > > > The "core-updates" branch is ready for testing! According to 'guix > > > > weather', the substitute coverage is slightly better than on "master" > > > > for x86_64. You can get it by running: > > > > > > > > guix pull --branch=core-updates > > > > > > > > Please try upgrading your profiles and systems and file bugs for > > > > anything that does not work for you. GNOME users in particular are > > > > encouraged to try the new GNOME 3.34 and report any regressions. > > > > > > I pulled from core-updates without problems, but "guix upgrade" failed. > > > > > > First, when running "guix upgrade", I got the following message, which I think is confusing because I use GNU, not Guix on a foreign distro: > > > > > > $ guix upgrade > > > guile: warning: failed to install locale > > > hint: Consider installing the `glibc-utf8-locales' or `glibc-locales' package and defining `GUIX_LOCPATH', along these lines: > > > > > > guix package -i glibc-utf8-locales > > > export GUIX_LOCPATH="$HOME/.guix-profile/lib/locale" > > > > > > See the "Application Setup" section in the manual, for more info. > > > > > > Then, everything was going alright, until building emacs-guix derivation failed: > > > > > > building /gnu/store/6kdl0pyv7i571d6b4vcxskr75ffqw1mk-emacs-guix-0.5.2.drv... > > > \ 'configure' phasebuilder for `/gnu/store/6kdl0pyv7i571d6b4vcxskr75ffqw1mk-emacs-guix-0.5.2.drv' failed with exit code 1 > > > build of /gnu/store/6kdl0pyv7i571d6b4vcxskr75ffqw1mk-emacs-guix-0.5.2.drv failed > > > View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/6k/dl0pyv7i571d6b4vcxskr75ffqw1mk-emacs-guix-0.5.2.drv.bz2'. > > > guix upgrade: error: build of `/gnu/store/6kdl0pyv7i571d6b4vcxskr75ffqw1mk-emacs-guix-0.5.2.drv' failed > > > > > > > > > The build log said: > > > > > > starting phase `configure' > > > source directory: "/tmp/guix-build-emacs-guix-0.5.2.drv-0/emacs-guix-0.5.2" (relative from build: ".") > > > build directory: "/tmp/guix-build-emacs-guix-0.5.2.drv-0/emacs-guix-0.5.2" > > > configure flags: ("CONFIG_SHELL=/gnu/store/pwcp239kjf7lnj5i4lkdzcfcxwcfyk72-bash-minimal-5.0.16/bin/bash" "SHELL=/gnu/store/pwcp239kjf7lnj5i4lkdzcfcxwcfyk72-bash-minimal-5.0.16/bin/bash" "--prefix=/gnu/store/bqplgazij77awh62579p56wbnxdb1c2l-emacs-guix-0.5.2" "--enable-fast-install" "--build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu") > > > configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-fast-install > > > checking for a BSD-compatible install... /gnu/store/57xj5gcy1jbl9ai2lnrqnpr0dald9i65-coreutils-8.32/bin/install -c > > > checking whether build environment is sane... yes > > > checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /gnu/store/57xj5gcy1jbl9ai2lnrqnpr0dald9i65-coreutils-8.32/bin/mkdir -p > > > checking for gawk... gawk > > > checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... no > > > checking whether make supports nested variables... yes > > > checking whether make supports nested variables... (cached) yes > > > checking for pkg-config... /gnu/store/krpyb0zi700dcrg9cc8932w4v0qivdg9-pkg-config-0.29.2/bin/pkg-config > > > checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes > > > configure: checking for guile 2.2 > > > configure: checking for guile 2.0 > > > configure: error: > > > No Guile development packages were found. > > > > > > Please verify that you have Guile installed. If you installed Guile > > > from a binary distribution, please verify that you have also installed > > > the development packages. If you installed it yourself, you might need > > > to adjust your PKG_CONFIG_PATH; see the pkg-config man page for more. > > > > > > command "/gnu/store/pwcp239kjf7lnj5i4lkdzcfcxwcfyk72-bash-minimal-5.0.16/bin/bash" "./configure" "CONFIG_SHELL=/gnu/store/pwcp239kjf7lnj5i4lkdzcfcxwcfyk72-bash-minimal-5.0.16/bin/bash" "SHELL=/gnu/store/pwcp239kjf7lnj5i4lkdzcfcxwcfyk72-bash-minimal-5.0.16/bin/bash" "--prefix=/gnu/store/bqplgazij77awh62579p56wbnxdb1c2l-emacs-guix-0.5.2" "--enable-fast-install" "--build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" failed with status 1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Then, I decided to remove emacs-guix, and try again to upgrade. This time, one of my packages in a custom channel failed with "no code for (term ansi-color)" (the package definition: https://gitlab.com/sirgazil/guix-channel-x/-/blob/master/sirgazil-x/packages/guile.scm#L13). This is not a new package in my profile, I've been using it for a long time. Since both error seemed to be related to Guile, I removed all Guile-related packages from my profile and tried upgrading again. This time, the upgrade succeeded. > > Thanks for testing! I fixed the emacs-guix issue in commit > f568581c2bfb3a7367442c9ccc23613c43f6f1e9 plus some related changes in > 962554ddcf86675362486a683acd94863ba68d8a and > 9b42918edd3f7e9d505c874d3947c0a0815fe551. It failed again, though: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40824