[bug#54036] [PATCH v5] gnu: gnunet: Update to 0.16.3.

[Tanguy LE CARROUR <tanguy@bioneland.org>]

Hi Maxim,


Quoting Maxim Cournoyer (2022-04-04 04:32:25)
> Tanguy LE CARROUR <tanguy@bioneland.org> writes:
> > Quoting Ludovic Courtès (2022-04-01 18:02:08)
> >> Tanguy Le Carrour <tanguy@bioneland.org> skribis:
> >> 
> >> > * gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet): Update to 0.16.3.
> >> > [arguments]: Enable all the tests that were disabled.
> >> > [inputs]: Use new style. [native-inputs]: Add openssl.
> >> > [home-page]: Update URL.
> >> 
> >> Woohoo!  Applied, thanks!
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Now, I "just" have to make sure that it works as expected! ^_^'
> 
> That's usually something we do *before* sending patches, but if given
> the test suite passes without disabling much (anything?) anymore, I'm
> confident it will :-).

You're right! :-)
Actually, I tested it before sending the patch.
But by "tested", I mean I only started the node and ran `gnunet-core`
to see if it was connected.

When I wrote "make sure that it works" I meant running another node, defining
records in GNS, resolving it from the other node, using the VPN,
trying re:claimID…


> > I might also try to make it build from source instead of
> > relying on the release archive!?
> 
> I usually prefer the release archive when it exists and is signed by the
> project's maintainer PGP key (which I believe must be the case here,
> given it's part of the GNU project).

+1!

I tried to build from source, but found out that the bootstrap phase was
cloning another repo (gana) and copying files over. :-(

So, if you're happy with the release archive… so am I! :-)


> Thanks for working on keeping our GNUnet package up to date!

My pleasure!


-- 
Tanguy