From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Self Subject: bug#34565: ungoogled-chromium contains Widevine DRM Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 18:19:30 -0800 Message-ID: <1550715570.3891.5.camel@jxself.org> References: <1550547897.31222.1.camel@jxself.org> <20190219070601.GA8273@jasmine.lan> <1550582906.5431.7.camel@jxself.org> <20190219144342.GA2688@jasmine.lan> <1550623152.12316.5.camel@jxself.org> <1550625137.14138.3.camel@jxself.org> <1550625587.14780.2.camel@jxself.org> <1550667811.25277.1.camel@jxself.org> <87zhqq3zb1.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-R4ZKrt/heJU/vNUbolKK" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51042) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwdy4-0004k7-BJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 21:20:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwdy2-0008Px-8y for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 21:20:08 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58065) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwdxy-0008Ni-LI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 21:20:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gwdxy-0007q9-71 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 21:20:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87zhqq3zb1.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 34565@debbugs.gnu.org --=-R4ZKrt/heJU/vNUbolKK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 22:49 +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > If it does after all contain objectionable files please point them > out so that we can remove them ASAP. That was done earlier in the thread. It might also be interesting to try building with enable_widevine=3Dtrue. In the context of the FSDG's "a free system distribution must not contain browsers that implement EME, the browser functionality designed to load DRM modules", I wonder if the browser would still be considered as "implementing" the "functionality ... to load DRM modules" from the FSF's viewpoint since it's only a build flag and the support for loading the module (even if not provided by Guix since it's non-free) seems otherwise intact. --=-R4ZKrt/heJU/vNUbolKK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAABCgAGBQJcbgqzAAoJEJ0NsxtUWjGYhi4P/1pB19ZHhMp5Z/C6OuvKUlT/ foJ+vuUbltzazI6FPxwnu1VNC5pyMcDVNFd6KzzwwgGlQrEj2FOs/jkjRR2YjEfV Oit2SyX9O0Vt5SH5S04ejquxKXLRrose7s7qO7yi84kOMfA8v7bUVM7SPdyBG4zP GXToTodOeNVgr0HMhst3AVC9ul0YqeF56Od0EwjiTitDam0hHycKy2w9rgz0sScf A3v1HpMzXrepXfROcwlblxHiF5Nsy4zSGiJ5MOK/UCQFz7SZLY2RINFnZHPrR2mu njj71qQRSlXWY9ebBC0MoE/gOh9FWXgJTWWyuRVb/x+D9/NfDIlCIzp2Ztr3GUth axArY0T8HRzh132a2sWtLnObxe1/dsjhmzm1TRhzMm7fYJkrwo+vOWUenryOHexA kkXvrPhH4/PAIdUSZKqtoX3+FSkBzgizatylMdHuLWIKSR/BQeAetpiCTn5pj1ty eTqNdycrdYwE+s4jSttUyO82ZEVkprZY9C9G4AxVUSmoZ5B3icjISXQVJdxdP2vG jiofpqfkHoq0Moc3UkvFhF6ebItgd1TqsjW7gA+/m6i30e4UdDAg933I9eiQ5Gwj lfGXhd+IIV6qLhXpjokGqVY+awaeRBkIuUtzY6QrgWCWuZ5Cgn7OVOntAGGKaebx 3MXPuzTXMU1rrA5sn4qL =l8JR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-R4ZKrt/heJU/vNUbolKK--