From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dpg Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python2-gyp Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 15:33:51 -0500 Message-ID: <1517862831.6194.5.camel@gmail.com> References: <1517631607.29145.3.camel@gmail.com> <87bmh3d17c.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-wJPKkysUWhjuQEi0TQA4" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37218) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1einSf-0006v1-4a for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 15:33:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1einSe-0005zQ-An for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 15:33:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87bmh3d17c.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ludo@gnu.org Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" --=-wJPKkysUWhjuQEi0TQA4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Hi doubleplusgood23, >=20 > doubleplusgood23@gmail.com skribis: >=20 > > From 1eff5aea55f171a09ab65bd7f75e39cd05ffd88b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: dpg > > Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 20:44:32 -0500 > > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Initial changes (not tested) >=20 > Not very confidence-inspiring. :-) >=20 > Please take a look at: >=20 > https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Submitting-Patches.h= tml >=20 > It=E2=80=99s a good idea to send patches that you think are ready. If yo= u have > issues while packaging, it=E2=80=99s better to ask for help on specific i= ssues > on help-guix@gnu.org and/or IRC. >=20 > Thanks, > Ludo=E2=80=99. Hello! Thanks for looking at my patch. =20 The initial patch there was just uploading a skeleton over git so I could d= ebug on my guix laptop. I was trying to squash the commit properly but clearly I messed up. I can assure you the commit has been through the linter, has had repeated builds, and is functional as a library. This is just a single patc= h for my larger goal to package Telegram, so it can sit on the backburner for a b= it. Thanks! --=20 dpg PGP Key: DA3ABDDC176CEF90 --=-wJPKkysUWhjuQEi0TQA4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQI4BAABCAAiBQJaeL+vGxxkb3VibGVwbHVzZ29vZDIzQGdtYWlsLmNvbQAKCRDa Or3cF2zvkBLMD/9uJEzs5zIlpEeEXTJucx1Wv6jFBPx2c0uZUJ2f/rXbj6N2SKTR TXm3PS6aqeWUqvGMh6QepuaSDMldX7l4jE7PiJEeItfe4bfc34yKDMBUG7Y7TtJj p0Yy6i2Pr1OLxpLM020hDGvuXthiV8L6PQ3BSXdpRjMM76Ye//BLwLk48AgqgXPX ZZ+te0lhuooXzlpLWtUXrkHqOzrB3vcG4E/BhmXI4QBZHhFIFs/+z0vNldH+k1ut S/zg0T2SiRp+ot5uMt/CBMnhIRcP1wjKcPuY2Qp6fwOc3gGurqH6rHGR8s3QYC1K xwhT07PsZxdCQJlMk07nd8KG4CAp7VNQG/iNH7+OOPV1jdQLjfCfeUSzP9ga/VQi R6fDs4+Sm50Xvy56JQR3eZLnlpzp71oYMCXjkaNi9JP0umQVHoFe0UlQslEMPwUG vWJKzf5LaEcs/cmcRdV4YGpd5IlvkhDCrYVfhjuezBWOwHyQTF+7S5ps9oNfyHJQ PQH46hzO8GxRYT8sllsxb4r+Znla7dI9gGSDd8XTlxKBKKzsRjPWrAVLz3YIn8Du KSFQPREdrbD2UTWgYScvIHDE9uwT0zTqc/EV95x4uNI56fLlGq978EhQciOjdXyY y5sxeG94XYGIrvUFa/jZLX+o5BrhMx2ZS4M4X9ZAqfDwfLThL2qysSYU6Q== =94ae -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-wJPKkysUWhjuQEi0TQA4--