From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adonay Felipe Nogueira Subject: Re: question about license of unofficial translation of GPL as a sample text in dbacl (Re: notmuch users: how do you filter debbugs?) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 11:22:59 -0300 Message-ID: <1476282179.3508.49.camel@adfeno-VPCEG17FB> References: <87a8etjjrn.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <877f9u6g3f.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaxesdpb.fsf@elephly.net> <8760pd8t1i.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87lgy9sg31.fsf@elephly.net> <87twcx5smz.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <877f9t8je0.fsf@hawkinsia.com> <87fuoh5n0y.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87lgy8xw4a.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <1475326642.5414.14.camel@adfeno-VPCEG17FB> <87lgy89pf1.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-XsZaT3zNYFuqa8+VHyI3" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38608) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buKRA-0000Ty-K9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:23:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buKR5-0004ro-IR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:23:16 -0400 Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.33]:56960) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buKR5-0004r9-AR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:23:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87lgy89pf1.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-XsZaT3zNYFuqa8+VHyI3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm not a lawyer, so please don't take my recommendations as definitive answer. Regarding license translations that only serve as sample text, then I guess the best thing to do is to remove the sample text. If you decide to contact a lawyer or someone from the FSF who's able to answer this question, please forward their answer here, or recommend them (FSF) to write a section in the licensing FAQ to cover/answer this concern. --=-XsZaT3zNYFuqa8+VHyI3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iF4EABEIAAYFAlf+R0MACgkQyNbhUgHunaGhwQD/b47lAgpPN3QFsUN/8twhxm/k wu+CPPjmURQuHs9JWAABAKbeZjTg7p7jGK4T2pMNWBpqQehgm4N4/9EkVuag0Uwc =/WDU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-XsZaT3zNYFuqa8+VHyI3--