From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Griffin Subject: Re: [PATCH] add go@1.6 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 06:25:49 -0500 Message-ID: <1469705149.4136290.679224129.5611758E@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <87d1lyzlga.fsf@guixsd-mailerver.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <1469667655.4000333.678845385.2261EF5D@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87bn1iysw0.fsf@guixsd-mailerver.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51323) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSjS1-0000ov-S1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 07:26:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSjRx-0001wl-Dq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 07:26:04 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:54034) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSjRv-0001u1-1p for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 07:26:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87bn1iysw0.fsf@guixsd-mailerver.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Matthew Jordan Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Thu, Jul 28, 2016, at 05:11 AM, Matthew Jordan wrote: > Doesn't sh already handle picking the shell/interpretor? That's why I > put it there. sh or an sh compatible shell is usually the first to > start. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. In Guix, sh is provided by bash, but when bash is launched as sh it gets put into a compatibility mode which might not be what script authors expect. In this case I guess it doesn't really matter, it's a small thing and it works either way. > This sounds like the beginning of a long conversation. Suffice to say > it's doesn't bother me either way. However I would rather change this > in later patch, if it has to be changed. Okay, sounds fine to me. Thanks for all your hard work! -- Alex Griffin