From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add package definition for GNU XaoS Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 15:45:49 -0500 Message-ID: <1450212349.849894.468405009.43798553@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <20151214220139.27f55979@himbaca> <20151214225825.GA30968@jasmine> <87mvtbsefl.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34856) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8wTr-0007kI-89 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 15:45:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8wTn-00072X-2p for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 15:45:55 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:49818) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8wTm-000727-ST for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 15:45:50 -0500 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C8C219C0 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 15:45:49 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87mvtbsefl.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Dec 15, 2015, at 14:24, Alex Kost wrote: > Leo Famulari (2015-12-15 01:58 +0300) wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:01:39PM +0100, Fabian Harfert wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> this is my first contribution to this project. I hope everything is > >> right with this package definition for GNU XaoS > >> (see https://www.gnu.org/software/xaos/). It's a nice program to > >> discover fractals, so I decided to use it for my first packaging > >> attempt. > > > > This program is a lot of fun! > > > >> + (license license:gpl2+))) > > > > Some of the files say "GPL 2 or later" and some say "GPL 3 or later". > > What's the typical way to denote that in the license field? > > I think we can just use a list with 2 licenses, but I didn't find GPL3 > in the source code, what files do you mean? You're right. I did `grep -rIi gpl` and didn't notice that all of the GPL 3 results were describing the licenses of the dependencies. > > -- > Alex