From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: screen locker Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 18:47:30 -0400 Message-ID: <1440197250.2569236.362721113.74E2C75F@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <55D5951B.2000705@gmx.ch> <87twrs8wzs.fsf@gmail.com> <1440179204.1859074.362503449.5F1BBD2E@webmail.messagingengine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48861) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSv5z-0006W1-S9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 18:47:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSv5v-0007Ur-T8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 18:47:35 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:55868) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSv5v-0007T8-LG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 18:47:31 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D047920246 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 18:47:30 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <1440179204.1859074.362503449.5F1BBD2E@webmail.messagingengine.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= , Marcus Moeller , guix-devel@gnu.org It seems that slock wants to have the setuid bit set. I see in the docs [1] that the store cannot contain setuid programs. Is the workaround in the docs only applicable to GuixSD, or can it be used with the standalone package manager? [1] http://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Setuid-Programs.html On Fri, Aug 21, 2015, at 13:46, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015, at 11:47, =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 wrote: > > Same here, I think only root can run it. > > (the unprivileged user can't set /proc/self/oom_score_adj). >=20 > Slock on Debian (package suckless-tools) doesn't have this issue. I am > looking into how they deal with it. >=20