From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luis Felipe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=F3pez?= Acevedo Subject: Re: [ART] Logo proposal Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:12:45 -0500 Message-ID: <1423710765.7046.9.camel@openmailbox.org> References: <1423405549.2120.7.camel@openmailbox.org> <87k2zqaf2g.fsf@gnu.org> <1423579572.2236.22.camel@openmailbox.org> <874mqsuoqi.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34270) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLkDT-0006sw-Ep for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:13:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLkDO-0003jf-6C for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:13:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <874mqsuoqi.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org El mi=C3=A9, 11-02-2015 a las 22:23 +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s escribi=C3= =B3: > Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo skribis: >=20 > > What worries me about staying close to the GNU branding is that it co= uld > > create the confusion RMS wants to avoid (people thinking that GuixSD = is > > *the* GNU OS and GNU's head its logo). He even suggested having a log= o > > for Guix and GuixSD [1][2]. So I think it would be better to play it > > safe and avoid any conflict within the GNU Project. We can still > > emphasise the close relationship between GuixSD and the GNU Project, = and > > hence the proposal of a wildebeest head as the logo for GuixSD too. >=20 > Yes, makes sense. >=20 > So, let=E2=80=99s use this GuixSD logo! >=20 > To begin with, I think we could use it in the GRUB and/or SLiM > backgrounds. WDYT? >=20 Yes, I'll work on that. > Then we=E2=80=99ll want to use it on the web site somehow, but the curr= ent > =E2=80=9Csite=E2=80=9D is really just one page, and it would seem odd t= o have the two > logos upfront on the same page. >=20 Yes. No need to put the logo right now in the current page. > Thus, the first step would be to come up with a multi-page site (yay!) > and with appropriate style. That probably means departing from the > gnu.org style sheets and server-side includes. This is not an ideal > solution, but it easier than trying to adjust all of gnu.org to meet ou= r > needs. I would hope that whoever takes up this task communicates with > the gnu.org webmasters in an effort to collaborate in the longer run. >=20 > Thoughts? Volunteers? >=20 While a place for the website is found, I can work on some mock-ups, if that's OK. > Lastly, I=E2=80=99m not sure what to do about the main Guix logo. On o= ne hand I > like the one you propose, but on the other I=E2=80=99m a bit reluctant = to > change. >=20 No problem. > Thanks again! Glad to help :)