From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luis Felipe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=F3pez?= Acevedo Subject: Re: [ART] Logo proposal Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:46:12 -0500 Message-ID: <1423579572.2236.22.camel@openmailbox.org> References: <1423405549.2120.7.camel@openmailbox.org> <87k2zqaf2g.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38868) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLC5Q-0008Kk-E8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:46:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLC5N-0002SH-8f for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:46:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87k2zqaf2g.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org El lun, 09-02-2015 a las 23:35 +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s escribi=C3=B3: > Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo skribis: >=20 > > I made some logos for Guix and GuixSD: > > > > * http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/static/temp/img/guix/Guix.png > > * http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/static/temp/img/guix/GuixSD.png > > > > I understand if you prefer using the current Guix logo and no logo fo= r > > GuixSD, though. I just wanted to share anyways. >=20 > I=E2=80=99m very impressed by both, I like them! >=20 > It raises the two questions you mention. I sympathize both with what > you wrote before and your current hesitation wrt. branding. >=20 What worries me about staying close to the GNU branding is that it could create the confusion RMS wants to avoid (people thinking that GuixSD is *the* GNU OS and GNU's head its logo). He even suggested having a logo for Guix and GuixSD [1][2]. So I think it would be better to play it safe and avoid any conflict within the GNU Project. We can still emphasise the close relationship between GuixSD and the GNU Project, and hence the proposal of a wildebeest head as the logo for GuixSD too. > I need to think more (and read more what others think) but yeah, why no= t > a GuixSD logo. No problem. Take your time. Thank you everyone for your feedback, and d4n1 for the alternative logo. [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-system-discuss/2015-01/msg00078.htm= l [2] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-system-discuss/2015-01/msg00079.htm= l --=20 Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/