From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Darrington Subject: (unknown) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 16:12:37 +0100 Message-ID: <1391526759-18655-1-git-send-email-jmd@gnu.org> Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58088) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAkvm-0000iG-Pp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:41:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAkvg-0004DZ-Jq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:41:10 -0500 Received: from de.cellform.com ([88.217.224.109]:45475 helo=jocasta.intra) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAhgF-0007am-0d for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 10:12:55 -0500 Received: from jocasta.intra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jocasta.intra (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id s14FCqJD018700 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 16:12:52 +0100 Received: (from john@localhost) by jocasta.intra (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id s14FCqPi018699 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 16:12:52 +0100 Subject: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org In my opinion the changelog conventions are achronistic, unintuitive, and bring benefit neither to developers nor users. However thanks for showing me the correct format. Updated patches follow