From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aljosha Papsch Subject: Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 01:01:31 +0200 Message-ID: <1381359691.1893.10.camel@creek.rivers> References: <20131002124146.GA15506@debian> <20131002180223.GA873@debian> <874n8zsc3c.fsf@gnu.org> <20131002205600.GA1680@debian> <20131002211808.GA26447@debian> <87li2bnwf9.fsf@gnu.org> <20131003110744.GB6327@debian> <1380905448.1869.11.camel@creek.rivers> <20131007195335.GB4641@debian> <1381338189.1968.20.camel@creek.rivers> <8738oatcsd.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gzTzvOzbQELmYUm/KJFZ" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52054) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VU2lM-0005Ng-RZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 19:01:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VU2lG-000474-T1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 19:01:52 -0400 Received: from ara.uberspace.de ([95.143.172.149]:49685) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VU2lG-00045O-K6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 19:01:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8738oatcsd.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-gzTzvOzbQELmYUm/KJFZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Mittwoch, den 09.10.2013, 22:22 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s: > I think we can follow our personal preferences to start with (I got > Guile, Emacs, and Ratpoison because that=E2=80=99s pretty much all I > need ;-)). > We do want to support some of these fancy desktops, but I don=E2=80=99t t= hink > there=E2=80=99s much we can plan: if/when someone wants to add XFCE, KDE,= or > Enlightenment, they=E2=80=99ll do it. I was trying to propose that Guix uses XFCE as the base for GNOME (maybe: XFCE/GNOME) for the long term, assuming that non-systemd GNOME installs won't be able to use gdm and some core functionality anymore in the future. I was not proposing to restrict Guix to KDE,XFCE,XFCE/GNOME, or not trying to package GNOME as it is. > Work on adding GNUstep and GNOME is very welcome as these are the > preferred desktops in the GNU system. Perhaps we should look for > hackers in these projects to give a hand. At the moment it should be doable to package GNOME as it is. I was only referring to the future. Just trying to plan, at least a little :) Best regards. --=20 GPG: 4F20BC96 https://rpapsch.de/gpg.asc --=-gzTzvOzbQELmYUm/KJFZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJSVeBWAAoJELY7+pVPILyWCg4H+wb4dPAWblkpFhOhXeTU3oTX fwN96Tv2as700ekNj2N6qv/IDPpMKP5cqIe/2qiKJx99TrMs9PdRto0Zm/0+Cmcr v8EgVvf/S97HR3YuUQ0o78NM0NB9NajF7PBh75pQ6pF3d5Y19FMkR7w3mjtvR0Jp WHkz8nJ9qk5okGURI5LErHFGpHxUpbfKIZiVmPOpneL5F/QmuzLrV4fX6QIBPuxK Re0OQvOHyFpysLso9g2heSR9Of0iNhmZgNKhI+AdJCf66ci1QTP5mRZhEL/xAbGC MwxlUhT9gG0todW8AK4rEEcEe585Aq39bAo5o3gvoVcPTGQdhbXnpuy7XK6t4dA= =V4DH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-gzTzvOzbQELmYUm/KJFZ--