Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome

[Aljosha Papsch <lists@rpapsch.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1136 bytes --]

Am Mittwoch, den 09.10.2013, 22:22 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> I think we can follow our personal preferences to start with (I got
> Guile, Emacs, and Ratpoison because that’s pretty much all I
> need ;-)).
> We do want to support some of these fancy desktops, but I don’t think
> there’s much we can plan: if/when someone wants to add XFCE, KDE, or
> Enlightenment, they’ll do it.

I was trying to propose that Guix uses XFCE as the base for GNOME
(maybe: XFCE/GNOME) for the long term, assuming that non-systemd GNOME
installs won't be able to use gdm and some core functionality anymore in
the future.
I was not proposing to restrict Guix to KDE,XFCE,XFCE/GNOME, or not
trying to package GNOME as it is.

> Work on adding GNUstep and GNOME is very welcome as these are the
> preferred desktops in the GNU system.  Perhaps we should look for
> hackers in these projects to give a hand.

At the moment it should be doable to package GNOME as it is.  I was only
referring to the future.  Just trying to plan, at least a little :)

Best regards.

-- 
GPG: 4F20BC96
https://rpapsch.de/gpg.asc



[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]