From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aljosha Papsch Subject: Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 18:50:48 +0200 Message-ID: <1380905448.1869.11.camel@creek.rivers> References: <20131002124146.GA15506@debian> <20131002180223.GA873@debian> <874n8zsc3c.fsf@gnu.org> <20131002205600.GA1680@debian> <20131002211808.GA26447@debian> <87li2bnwf9.fsf@gnu.org> <20131003110744.GB6327@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HtCt1YzOvcVCz77sXLam" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49165) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VS8b3-0008RP-90 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:51:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VS8at-0008Bx-Mw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:51:21 -0400 Received: from ara.uberspace.de ([95.143.172.149]:47341) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VS8at-0008BV-EF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:51:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20131003110744.GB6327@debian> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-HtCt1YzOvcVCz77sXLam Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Donnerstag, den 03.10.2013, 13:07 +0200 schrieb Andreas Enge: > That is true. But I feel about GNOME as you feel about KDE, and am not > overly > motivated to do more work on it, so it would be good if some volunteer > GNOME users stepped forward to take over. I'm a GNOME user (and occasional contributor) and may start packaging once I'm done with PHP (it already installs). While it should be possible to provide a full GNOME experience (with gdm and gnome-shell) at the moment, I guess it will be quite a bit of work, also maintaining it, since GNOME assumes more and more systemd behavior: http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2013/09/25/gnome-and-logindsystemd-thoughts= / Best regards. --=20 GPG: 4F20BC96 https://rpapsch.de/gpg.asc --=-HtCt1YzOvcVCz77sXLam Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJSTvH6AAoJELY7+pVPILyWlQIH+gLba+MEgbsr/wVoU84Y2Xw8 PLFqlcfVOaIJYZtTfbJeVeR28y2JFbVJo8BY07TqROUN4wSzI5R4IpF2b3MROuzl GtG+z9Y9BU7NrN7n+8zBMqrjPKScStkSm5cGVJX2J3nmVBuXWEAtftOpCNfMmUfv wVNLUaQlmZTwM7ILR44FpMJj7js7buXAyptFiKAzXbhPeO1S8pgIvqJLq7tZBxGU 3gjGTAzndPgUjUynqrtGdCCuwDJ9Ouqr2CJLZlIqDeOb6H9CpqvEeVRA3C/8x1Ly EAu9amec+O0/RWPQZUgYTN3ZejdybxIiLPNt3jMCQcshuGAcxH9kzbBswNEwNFo= =KkRY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HtCt1YzOvcVCz77sXLam--