From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luther Subject: Does --no-substitutes save bandwidth? Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 04:20:10 -0400 Message-ID: <1368692410.27899.11.camel@aiwass> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48811) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UctQA-0004Au-BD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 04:20:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UctQ5-0004Q2-SL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 04:20:18 -0400 Received: from mail-yh0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c01::231]:56872) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UctQ5-0004Pu-NE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 04:20:13 -0400 Received: by mail-yh0-f49.google.com with SMTP id f73so627193yha.36 for ; Thu, 16 May 2013 01:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.139] (adsl-184-36-85-143.asm.bellsouth.net. [184.36.85.143]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f71sm8678338yha.8.2013.05.16.01.20.11 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 16 May 2013 01:20:12 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: bug-guix@gnu.org I've installed Guix 0.2 on my Ubuntu system. As I type this, I'm using it to install gcc. If all goes well, I hope to soon install Trisquel as my base system with Guix as a package manager. I'm trying to save as much bandwidth as possible, so I started the daemon with --no-substitutes. But it occurred to me that binaries might not be much bigger than source tarballs, even with documentation. What do you guys think? Would --no-substitutes be generally useful for saving bandwidth? Luther