From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dftxbs3e Subject: Re: powerpc64[le]-linux port progress Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 02:34:28 +0100 Message-ID: <13513d35-0775-5364-86d7-56e6f3f80400@free.fr> References: <5f6558fb-5aba-770e-1097-2730262876d4@free.fr> <87imjyvm0e.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MZ5iy7IqAiJYWZGPyna1gleQdyvLDx1Vx" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37342) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j5gAa-0002TE-Jo for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 20:34:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j5gAZ-00057L-FH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 20:34:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87imjyvm0e.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Cc: Guix Devel This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --MZ5iy7IqAiJYWZGPyna1gleQdyvLDx1Vx Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8Y24uPlC7h0D6oim48tLcoe8iGHvzmjbB"; protected-headers="v1" From: dftxbs3e To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Cc: Guix Devel Message-ID: <13513d35-0775-5364-86d7-56e6f3f80400@free.fr> Subject: Re: powerpc64[le]-linux port progress References: <5f6558fb-5aba-770e-1097-2730262876d4@free.fr> <87imjyvm0e.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87imjyvm0e.fsf@gnu.org> --8Y24uPlC7h0D6oim48tLcoe8iGHvzmjbB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-US On 2/22/20 1:34 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Have you tried building static gawk standalone and check it for that > bash? You could do something like > > grep -ao '/gnu/store/e*-bash' $(./pre-inst-env guix build -e '(@@ (g= nu packages make-bootstrap) %static-binaries)') > > On my x86_64-linux system, I get > > /gnu/store/eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee-bash Yes! I used the strings utility. I get two references to bash-static in the store with 'eeeee'. Speaking of which, do you know if it's possible to be spawned into an environment where %static-binaries's gawk package (and only that one) sources are extracted, patched and configured? So that I can investigate the inclusion of bash-static comfortably. > For the new Scheme-only bootstrap, I solved a similar problem for > %bootstrap-mes by replacing the /gnu/store/eee* store-references with > actual bootstrap file names; see `%bootstrap-mes-rewired' in > core-updates http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/package= s/commencement.scm?h=3Dcore-updates#n251 > I hear, however that smells like a hack to me, I'd like to avoid resorting to such unless absolutely necessary. How come it's not possible to find where that bash-static reference is being inserted? --8Y24uPlC7h0D6oim48tLcoe8iGHvzmjbB-- --MZ5iy7IqAiJYWZGPyna1gleQdyvLDx1Vx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYIAB0WIQQozTys6hLca3Ekt8u3HhLxn6GoewUCXlHWpQAKCRC3HhLxn6Go e9p0AP9/iU5AXQ16Wlhimw/smr/W11uLGJbbfhvicG+dykcS9AD/Svy8Ka4tcEFu B954M5cUXr/XV2N+FayNPtmE7La3Dwk= =J74X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MZ5iy7IqAiJYWZGPyna1gleQdyvLDx1Vx--